BLOG

Blog comments: Add some fuel to the discussion

businessweekTry as I might, I couldn’t resist clicking on the link last week that seemed to be showing up everywhere I turned. It felt like every other tweet on Twitter included a link to B.L. Ochman’s post debunking the six myths of social media. I tried to avoid it because it felt, to me, like yet another post aimed at stirring up debate in the social media echo chamber.

I was correct in it being a hornets’ nest for the Twitterati. Where I was wrong was thinking that I should try to avoid it. B.L. wrote a great post that sparked more than 95 comments on BusinessWeek.com. One of those comments was mine (once you’re sucked into the conversation it’s hard to escape):

Mike Maney, Feb 19, 2009 3:58 PM GMT
“While maybe not perfect (on the pricing), B.L.’s take on the involvement required to do social media right is spot-on. It’s not only tough to do well, but it takes time as well. The issue I have is that social media is (and should be) just one component of a larger communications strategy. And that’s where the discussion of campaign pricing and involvement falls down. Companies should be looking at pricing/commitment in the context of their overall programs rather than silo’ed campaigns.”

There’d be no shame in thinking the basis of this post was about debunking social media’s six myths. However, there’s a bigger lesson to be learned from B.L.’s post. My comment above — a 20-second, brain-to-keyboard thoughtburst — is this morning the featured comment in the “In Your Face” column now running on the front page of BusinessWeek.com. What started as a quick dash of commentary turned into visibility for the 0to5 brand. Was visibility what I was trying for? Not consciously. I was simply adding what I thought might be good fuel for the conversation.

Do you use your expertise and experience to advance conversations happening within your sphere of influence? If not, what’s holding you back?